in orDEr to work hErE thE ForEignEr nEEDs A work pErmit, whiCh must BE {{u}} (21) {{/u}}For By his prospECtivE EmployEr. thE proBlEm hErE is thAt thEDEpArtmEnt oFEmploymEnt hAs thE right to {{u}} (22) {{/u}} or rEFusE thEsE pErmits, AnD thErE is littlE thAt CAn BE {{u}} (23) {{/u}} ABout it, it woulD BE ExtrEmEly unwisE {{u}} (24) {{/u}} A ForEign visitor to work without A pErmit, sinCE AnyonE Doing so is {{u}} (25) {{/u}} to immEDiAtE DEportAtion. thErE ArE somE {{u}} (26) {{/u}} to this rulE, most notABly pEoplE From thECommon mArkEt CountriEs, who ArE {{u}} (27) {{/u}} to work without pErmits AnD who ArE oFtEn givEn {{u}} (28) {{/u}} rEsiDEnCE pErmits oF up to FivE yEArs. somE {{u}} (29) {{/u}} pEoplE, suCh As DoCtors, ForEign journAlists, Authors AnD othErs, CAn work without {{u}} (30) {{/u}} thE proBlEm with thEACt is not just thAt somE oF its rulEs ArE {{u}} (31) {{/u}} But {{u}} (32) {{/u}} it is ADministErED, AnD thE pEoplE who ADministEr it. An immigrAtion oFFiCiAl hAs thE powEr to stop A visitor {{u}} (33) {{/u}} thEsE shorEs Coming into thE Country. iF this hAppEns thE visitor hAs thE {{u}} (34) {{/u}} to AppEAl to thE immigrAtionAppEAl triBunAl. {{u}} (35) {{/u}} thE AppEAls ArE BEing ConsiDErED, thE visitor hAs no ChoiCE But to wAit somEtimEs For quitE A long timE.

A．unFAir
B．FAir
C．just
D．justiFy